MSSQL VS PostgreSQL vs MySQL

Microsoft SQL Server (MSSQL), PostgreSQL, and MySQL are three of the most widely used relational database management systems in the world. Each is mature, capable, and suitable for enterprise-grade workloads, but they differ significantly in licensing, performance characteristics, extensibility, ecosystem, administrative experience, and ideal use cases.

At a high level:

• MSSQL is  often favoured in Microsoft-centric enterprise environments, especially where deep integration with Windows Server, Active Directory,  .NET, Power BI, SSIS/SSRS/SSAS, and strong vendor support are priorities.

• PostgreSQL is  widely considered the most feature-rich open-source relational   database, excelling in standards compliance, extensibility, advanced  SQL capabilities, GIS support, and complex analytical or transactional workloads.

• MySQL is known for simplicity, broad hosting support, strong web ecosystem  adoption, and reliable performance for read-heavy and general-purpose      applications, particularly in LAMP-stack environments.

Choosing the best platform depends on workload type, team skill set, ecosystem fit, budget, cloud strategy, expected scale, compliance requirements, and operational preferences.

Performance depends heavily on workload, schema design, indexing strategy, hardware, concurrency level, memory, storage speed, query patterns, and tuning. No single database is universally fastest.

MSSQL

MSSQL performs very well in enterprise OLTP and mixed transactional/reporting workloads, especially when deployed on properly licensed hardware with professional tuning.

Performs well in:

• Complex   transactional systems
• Mixed  OLTP + BI scenarios
• Large  enterprise reporting environments

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is highly competitive in complex read/write workloads and often excels in analytical queries, complex joins, and concurrency-heavy systems.

Performs well in:

• Complex SQL operations
• High-integrity  transactional workloads
• GIS  and JSON-heavy workloads
• Advanced indexing scenarios

MySQL

MySQL traditionally performs strongly in read-heavy and simple transactional applications. It is often very efficient for web-scale CRUD patterns when properly indexed.

Performs well in:

• Read-heavy   web applications
• Simpler  OLTP systems
• CMS, e-commerce, session stores, and catalog systems

Choose MSSQL if:

• Your organization is heavily invested in Microsoft technologies
• You need integrated BI, ETL, and reporting
• You want strong GUI administration tools
• Commercial  vendor support is essential
• Compliance, auditing, and enterprise security are top priorities

Choose PostgreSQL if:

• You need advanced SQL and extensibility
• You want to avoid licensing costs
• Your workloads involve GIS, JSONB, custom functions, or complex queries
• You value open-source flexibility
• Your engineering team is comfortable with tuning and deeper database operations

Choose MySQL if:

• You are building web applications or SaaS products with standard relational needs
• Simplicity, fast deployment, and broad ecosystem support matter
• Your workload is read-heavy or straightforward OLTP
• Budget  sensitivity is high
• You need a mature, widely supported database with a lower learning curve

All use client server architecture and memory and storage. 

For more details on it, will create new page and videos.